*Nuclear energy: analysis pro, contra

_ Here below: An English language translation. It is an automatic software translation of the first dorcument part. Mostlly not rectified... many errors... but it is possible to understand the contents. The complete document: So far only in the German language. In case of a modest donation, to offer to ok @ vox7.com , complete translation could be supplied - automatic by software or by a native speaker.

Reader's comment: Why nuclear energy is better. Full comment:

► https://www.heise.de/forum/Telepolis/Kommentare/Kernkraft-und-Klimapolitik/Ein-paar-Fakten-zum-Thema-mit-entsprechenden-Quellen/posting-35495877/show/

Here an excerpt: cbmuser Oct 27, 2019
A few facts about the topic with corresponding sources

There are currently 52 nuclear reactors under construction:
► https://pris.iaea.org/PRIS/WorldStatistics/UnderConstructionReactorsByCountry.aspx

Just went or are going online:

Taishan-2: ► https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taishan_Nuclear_Power_Plant
Belarus: ► https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belarusian_nuclear_power_plant
Novovoronezh II: ► https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novovoronezh_Nuclear_Power_Plant_II

Nuclear energy is statistically the safest:
► https://ourworldindata.org/what-is-the-safest-form-of-energy

IEA says that it is not possible without:
► https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2019/may/steep-decline-in-nuclear-power-would-threaten-energy-security-and-climate-goals.html

In Fukushima the affected areas can be reoccupied:
► https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/04/05/national/evacuees-can-return-next-week-parts-okuma-host-fukushima-nuclear-plant-likely/



Several reader comments: Turning nuclear power plant waste into benefits?

From DIE WELT "2019-11-11": https://www.welt.de/debatte/article203395460/Energieversorgung-Atommuell-ist-in-Wahrheit-ein-Wertstoff.html

=== Fl.B. As far as aces are concerned, however, nuclear power plants are innocent. The lion's share of the waste there comes from medicine, industry and research.

=== Da.N. A reactor of the 4th generation or fast breeder already exists. It is located in Russia, in Beloyarsk and is called BN-800. It is currently used for the "burning" of weapon plutonium, but can also "burn" conventional nuclear waste from light water reactors. Unfortunately, Germany is just entering the Middle Ages with its wind waste and wind barons.

--- Ni.H. In Russia there is already a reactor (BN 800) in commercial operation, which feeds about 800MW into the power grid and has the ability to use nuclear waste as fuel. A successor with even greater capacity is already under construction.

--- Pag. The BN800 operates with MOX fuel, i.e. military-grade plutonium mixed with nuclear waste. Since we do not have any surplus plutonium to burn, the technology is not really target-oriented for us.

=== We. O. Hello, Hi Hi, nice joke.
"because the radiation of this isotope would not cause any noticeable damage even after swallowing.
(Source WELT article) Well, it depends on the dose.
But, seriously, please tell me where you want to build the 65 nuclear power stations for Germany?
Where do you get the water from?
Who will build this nuclear power station?
If 8 are built every 10 years, it will take about 80 years to build them all. Not counting that the first ones will fail after 45 years.
Well I am against nuclear power plants, but I give you the permission to build them. But unfortunately they won't find any space to build, let alone investors. Look at England, despite the promise of guaranteed remuneration and fixed price electricity, no investors can be found.
And the reactor in France should have been ready in 2012, but it is not (maybe 2023?). So keep dreaming good dreams and hopefully no nuclear accident.
Oh yes, Russia, floating nuclear power plant 45MW, madness. First floating nuclear power plant; ha ha. What about the nuclear aircraft carriers, icebreakers, submarines etc. All floating nuclear power plants.

=== G.B. In the future, electricity from nuclear energy for 8 cents per kwh and driving a car without having to refuel. because the battery lasts a lifetime. Mr Kro... should take care that he does not have an accident by chance, because many people, especially our government and the sheikhs, are not interested in this technology and will know how to prevent it.

--- De.S. Fantasized? Look for "Ford Nucleon". It didn't get beyond the design stage, but the idea was already there in the 50s.

--- Uw.C. Maybe not exactly for the car, but thorium liquid salt reactors could relieve us of the worst legacy of the fission reactor generation (Dual Fluid Reactor).

=== Al,K. Before the nuclear lobby fantasises about nuclear-powered cars, it should first solve the mystery of the inexplicable cancer clusters that are forming around nuclear power stations.

--- Al.S. cancer clusters around nuclear power plants? Well, just enter "Hard Coal Radiation Exposure" in Google - yes, it is about coal-fired power stations - and you will find studies on the subject from BUND, the Ministry of the Interior and the Ministry of Economics. Let me give you a short quote from the various studies on the subject "... that the radiation risk in the vicinity of a modern coal-fired power station alone - in relation to the same output - is almost 100 times greater than in the vicinity of a nuclear power station". Any further questions?